TORIES TO BRING IN ‘BANNING ORDERS’ ON KNOWN ANARCHIST HOOLIGANS!

Just watched a fractious  House of commons debate  Saturday’s  protests. My..my..they’re more rattled than I thought. Theresa May is considering bringing in football hooligan style banning orders for anarchist hooligans to prevent them protesting!! She’s also considering revising the 1886 Riot Act. Meanwhile the labour front bench was screaming that she should ensure that all the UNCUT UK  occupiers should be remanded in custody.The worst kind of hurried legislation and panicky demands for repressive action. The whole semi-hysterical mood was in response to the actions of the Black Bloc. The TUC march woudn’t have got two seconds. What comrades does that tell our young people about how to make effective protests? Who will have the glory of being the first banned anarchist hooligan? Dame Glory beckons Professor Knight ! The prospect of the first banned hooligan being 68 years old will be priceless!

26 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

26 responses to “TORIES TO BRING IN ‘BANNING ORDERS’ ON KNOWN ANARCHIST HOOLIGANS!

  1. Steven

    The ruling class is rattled, labour, tory ,liberal et al, and we can expect more repressive legislation, more breaches of individual and collective human rights, more propaganda from this scum. Our response? is to fight on and to say fuck off to the lot of them , the tory toffs, the liberal wankers and the labour party bastards. You wont stop us, you will never stop us until your system is destroyed

  2. INCUBUS

    Seems Lady Klingon wants to ban facemasks and balaclavas- obviously she is unaware that they are already illegal under the public order act- But will this cover the cop’s masks too? (who were as far as I could see, covering up their numbers en-masse…)
    Not all of us are suffering from delusions of naivity, cos I didn’t see any UKuncut people with their faces covered while they were doing criminal damage to certain tax-dodging companies daily takings….

  3. Guy

    They can already do this, 2 members of the edl have recently been banned from meetings and demos for ten years. Speaking of the edl, how they will love to demand that the police force people to remove burhkas etc.

    • Ruddie

      And they would have a fair point, no?

      No fucking special privileges for dogshit religions as far as I am concerned.

  4. Timothy

    Look how their Slaves misrepresent what little understanding they have of Law at the moment and you’ll see just how ridiculous it all is. The more they try and take away peoples’ freedoms the faster their system will collapse.

    watch?v=5vYWwaMmDfA

  5. Timothy

    Look how their Slaves misrepresent what little understanding they have of Law at the moment and you’ll see just how ridiculous it all is. The more they try and take away peoples’ freedoms the faster their system will collapse.

  6. police have been doing this for ages? they slap city-centre banning orders on anyone they can get their hands on, in glasgow of late anyway.

  7. rab c nesbitt

    dont think it will be chris night ……..can see you in the frame tho ian.

  8. b

    “The whole semi-hysterical mood was in response to the actions of the Black Bloc. The TUC march woudn’t have got two seconds. What comrades does that tell our young people about how to make effective protests?”

    What it DOESN’T tell us is that getting media coverage (and politicians are no more than media operatives – they don’t really ‘run the country’) indicates that we’re getting somewhere.

    While I’m here, this is from some bourgeois rag or other:

    “Cdr Broadhurst has warned that similar groups may also be planning to target the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton on 29 April. He said the Met had been looking into increasing its use of stop-and-search powers for that event. The royal wedding has a different tenor to it. It’s a security operation largely, in certain parts of London. I think it’s quite appropriate that a police service has different powers in terms of security, as against people’s rights to come and openly protest. “For the wedding, we’ll be looking from terrorism downwards. For protests, we’re hoping that people come and put their rights to good effect and protest peacefully. They are two different ends of the spectrum.”

    Yes, this is the Britain we know. Nothing must ever be condoned which upsets the royal family. Normal procedures don’t apply where those bastards are concerned.

  9. James

    About an hour ago on his Twitter account Labour M.P., David Hanson, claims he has asked police to ensure that acts of incitement of violence on social networks are prosecuted.

    http://twitter.com/#!/DavidHansonMP

  10. Dora Kaplan

    Poor Theresa, it’s so unfair. People have been robbed blind by the political class, sold down the river by the TUC, manipulated, poisoned and ripped off by the corporate sector, had their children wiped out in pointless wars based on systematic lies, watched bankers getting rich on their stolen cash, and now they’re getting out of hand. Why can’t people just shut up and die quietly when they’ve been fucked over? Surely the law needs updating!

  11. Roger Grenville

    David Hanson and “Sir” Gerald Kaufman are both at it doing their brown-nosing,coppers’ nark impressions. Sadly the only Labour MP who seems,today,to have any balls at all is John McDonnell

  12. Mr. Jolly

    Perfect timing for a complete lockdown for the royal wedding.

  13. Mr. Jolly

    “Meanwhile the labour front bench was screaming that she should ensure that all the UNCUT UK occupiers should be remanded in custody.” Would love to see this footage, anyone got a link?

  14. INCUBUS

    Lockdown, schlockdown- The state is always full of piss and wind after a day like Saturday, ‘vote for us, legislation, blah blah’. The power of imagination always outwits authority, up until it removes it’s mask to reveal the tyranny beneath…Where were the water cannon? Where were the ‘new tactics’? Where was the ‘coming down hard on troublemakers’ bollox? They are shitting themselves because the economy is in ruins, no-one trusts Labour, and no-one will have any faith in the unions soon enough… The state is on the back foot politically and economically, they have no Plan ‘B’ for any contingency.
    The longer and harder they shit on us, the deeper they dig their own graves, and they know it, and they know that we know it too…But the poor posh things are programmed to be utter bastards, and just can’t help themselves…
    Dollar hyperinflation, Euro collapse, Japan=History.
    I say stink bomb the Royal Wedding, have a glorious piss up, and then get ready for Mayday and a loooong HOT summer!

  15. Berty Bakunin

    Hmmm, looked at the debate on Hansard online and no trace there of Labour front bench calling for UK Uncut to be remanded in custody.

  16. Anon

    If they start banning people (or even if they don’t) people could begin covert operations (in the night, anonymous etc) – small groups strike wherever and whenever far less preventable, far more damage and far less people will get caught.

  17. Mr. Jolly

    If they are going to ban face covering at demonstrations, what about burkas? I don’t know why but I have the scene from Carry On up the Khyber in mind, with Sid James and Bernard Breslaw hiding in a harem as temptress belly dances.

  18. b

    incubus, you make a good point when you ask where were the water cannon, but you’re kidding yourself if you think “they have no Plan ‘B’ for any contingency”. Unless you mean they can’t make across the board concessions, and ‘must’ attack us, which is true. By ‘us’ I mean the working class, not activists who wish to take advantage of the royal wedding for ever-so-naughty purposes!

    I wonder how many people in the country are open to the idea that holding the Olympics is, to say the least, vile, when living standards are going through the floor and the national armed forces are bogged down in two (which may soon turn into three) totally unwinnable wars.

    The Olympics will be used to promote the royal family BIG-TIME. One member of that family is on the International Olympic Committee and sits on the London Organising Committee. A few years ago they were talking about having the opening ceremony march up the Mall. Showing Buckingham Palace to a few billion people worldwide. No kidding.

  19. Ashe

    How about bans on a few bankers?…they’ve caused far more real damage than anyone from UKuncut or the black block.

  20. INCUBUS

    @ b-
    “Unless you mean they can’t make across the board concessions, and ‘must’ attack us, which is true. By ‘us’ I mean the working class, ”

    Yes, and yes!

    And I thought my stinkbomb idea was a rather good one…and also likely to find mass support from around the country, for a bloody good laugh at their expense…but if you want to go up against CO19 instead…

  21. Lab X

    collage anarchiste Theresa May speech March 28th 2011

  22. I’ve already been told I’m CERTAINLY NOT on the Royal Wedding Guest list!

  23. Pingback: Chris Knight (O.B.E.Z.) Order of the British Exclusion Zone | professorknight

Leave a reply to Mr. Jolly Cancel reply